Ye Tan: Zhang Weiying Is Not Good At Dean &Nbsp; Good.

Zhang's appointment seems to have been compelled to suspect. A Peking University Guanghua teacher who asked not to be named, told reporters that "the selection of presidents, democratic recommendation and organizational investigation are all important.

Wei Ying may have more offense in interpersonal relations.

His ideas are new, but many viewpoints have aroused social controversy, which seems to be somewhat deviated from the dean's role.

This is probably the reason why he can not succeed. "

It seems that Zhang Weiying's market theory and public opinion foundation have problems.

Zhang Weiying's resignation is a good thing, not a bad thing.

A practical professor is better than ten boring professors with half professors and half officials.

Since then, Zhang Weiying has been able to run along the famous professor's road without having to be held responsible for reforming officials in the professors and education departments.

Since he is a professor of economics who holds a strong view of the market, Zhang Weiying first wants to separate himself from education and administration from his own beginning. Now, whether he is forced or active, he has finally practiced his education proposition.

Prof. Zhang Weiying has a reputation as a famous scholar. He has a lot of sayings. "Officials are the biggest interest groups in the reform." "the poor can not afford to learn because the tuition is too low."

It is understandable that a professor boldly propagandize his own views. As long as this propaganda does not break through the bottom line of public order and good morals and universal values, as an official in the education system, the above remarks are indigestion.

Zhang Weiying's words may be magnified by the media, but some of them are distorted.

In addition to speaking freely, it is unforgettable for Zhang Weiying to promote the reform in Peking University.

from

Even in the most famous universities in China, it is difficult to implement normal measures in developed market countries.

The result is Peking University chicken flying dog jump, the author heard the Peking University two young teachers at the table abusing Zhang Weiying, think Zhang Weiying does not understand the shortcomings of China's education system and the suffering of young teachers, close door reform, shut down and build cars.

{page_break}

In fact, the biggest problem facing Zhang Weiying's reform is that he can not reform the educational system. On the contrary, he must rely on the education system.

Zhang Weiying's education reform did not touch on the administrative system, and no administrative measures were taken by anyone. The reason was: "first, at the same time, the administrative reform and the reform of the teacher system are too great for the stability of the school work. Two, after the implementation of the teacher personnel management reform, the administrative personnel system reform is carried out for a period of time, and the administrative personnel are relatively easy to accept. Three, the quality and efficiency of the administrative staff are important, but the key to a university is the quality of the teaching staff". However, the chronic disease of education is in the administrative management, and the cost of reform is borne by the teachers.

Such a reform idea may come from the same argument that officials are the biggest group, but they lose the courage, justice and means needed for reform.

Zhang Weiying is doomed to be unable to become Cai Yuanpei, but sadly, he has neither Cai Yuanpei's space nor Cai Yuanpei's heart.

Xiong Bingqi, a professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, once said, "the core of the reform of university personnel system is not the appointment system, nor the elimination system, but the establishment of a modern school system.

The reform of Peking University, as well as the whole system of employment offered by other schools, emphasized the efficiency of teachers, but ignored a fundamental problem, that is, "academic autonomy and professors' governance".

Sincere, sage.

It is Zhang Weiying's limitation that he has no independent educational character and makes teachers a donkey.

It is impossible to see this point with Zhang Weiying's wisdom, but the breakthrough of reform that Zhang Weiying chose is the pass that he thinks is easier to break. In fact, on the contrary, there is no fundamental reform, partial reform can not be successful, and the surface success will be out of shape.

Zhang Weiying's reform and speech remind people of the hardship of China's reform in the past hundred years. From Kang Youwei to Sun Zhongshan, reformers need not to shake up their speeches, but to grasp the national conditions accurately, sympathize with the people's livelihood, and sound reform measures based on sympathy and support from the masses and reform forces.